This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: good news and bad news
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: good news and bad news
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
> > Please disable all the flags related to that, rebuild, and try again. I
> > suspect that's the problem.
>
> It was. Now I'm seeing problems with static executables, but that's a
> gcc problem rather than a v3 problem.
cool
> > As --gc-sections is broken anyway, even on linux, I'm thinking of
> > disabling it.
>
> Now that I think about it... Does garbage collecting the sections in a
> library at all make sense? Creating data/function sections is way cool,
> since it opens up all those possibilities to the user's executables.
> But even if --gc-sections were working perfectly, how do we tell which
> parts of a /library/ never get called?
yes. it makes sense. Current technology won't work, but I have hope for
the future.
There was some discussion of this on the binutils list between Ulrich,
Alan Molda, and I within the last two months. You might check that.
-benjamin