This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: AIX status
- To: libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: AIX status
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 19:25:16 -0400
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Let's also be clear that any system is a series of design choices
and tradeoffs. All systems have their own peculiarities, benefits, and
drawbacks. If someone is accustomed to and prefers one system, fine;
however, that does not make the other systems bad. There is a large
design space to comprehend before making such claims.
If the developers do not want to create a portable C++ library --
requiring the necessary extra infrastructure and effort, but ultimately
creating a better result for everyone -- fine. Just say so and we can
stop all of this effort and find a different way to provide a portable C++
library for GCC. If we are providing a portable C++ library for GCC, then
complaining about the effort to be portable on Unix-like systems across a
wide variety of markets is a waste of everyone's time and scape-goating.
Choosing narrow, arbitrary, system-dependent cutoffs for
first-tier support is a slippery slope which likely will bite the very
people proposing it on the next round. I find this system xenophobia very
discouraging.
David