Re: adding 'g++-v3/cshadow' to cpp search path...

[brent verner <brent at rcfile dot org>]

On 22 Aug 2000 at 22:17 (-0400), brent verner wrote:
| Greetings,
| 
| I didn't have time to dig more into sorting out the real cshadow
| problem, so I decided I could at least be productive by hacking the 
| gcc build to have cpp search 'g++-v3/cshadow' for includes first.

success!! kinda :)

(my) g++ is now pulling includes from:
  ${prefix}/include/g++-v3/cshadow
  ${prefix}/include/g++-v3

I'll submit a patch tomorrow (night), after I install the 'approved'
maintainer tools -- I can't verify the work until I regenerate,
which leads to a question: 

  when submitting a patch that modifies configure.in, should the 
  diff include the regenerated configure, or just the changes to 
  configure.in?

  should this patch be sent to gcc-patches since it modifies
  gcc/configure.in? or would it be best to kick it around 
  here (review) it here for a bit first?

TIA for your input.

cheers.
  brent

-- 
Damon Brent Verner                        o      _     _         _
Cracker JackŪ Surprise Certified  _o     /\_   _ \\o  (_)\__/o  (_)
brent@rcfile.org                _< \_   _>(_) (_)/<_    \_| \   _|/' \/
brent@linux1.org               (_)>(_) (_)        (_)   (_)    (_)'  _\o_