Re: Two small patches

[Alfred Minarik <a8601248@unet.univie.ac.at>]

Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
> 
> In fact, the 'correct' fix is
> 
>         inline float
>         modf(float __x, float* __y) { return ::modff(__x, __y); }
> 
> that is I should have written ::modff(); not ::modf().

This is interesting, as I was under 
the impression, that the intend of this header
is to implement float function with their
double equivalents.
So as it is possible to use the '___f' versions,
what is the point in going through doubles at
all.

so for example with sin() instead of 

inline float
sin(float __x) { return ::sin(__x); }

why not 

inline float
sin(float __x) { return ::sinf(__x); }

or in fact all three of them

inline float
sin(float __x) { return ::sinf(__x); }
inline double
sin(double __x) { return ::sin(__x); }
inline long double
sin(long double __x) { return ::sinl(__x); }

Alfred