This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

refcounting basic_string<> and thread safety


I'm guessing that the current refcounting <string> with gcc/egcs
library isn't thread safe?

Will the new basic_string<> delivered with libstdc++-v3 be thread
safe? 

Ref. the discussion currently going on in the egcs mailing list:
        http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1999-06/msg00680.html
        http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1999-06/msg00681.html
        http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1999-06/msg00691.html
        http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1999-06/msg00715.html
        http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1999-06/msg00723.html

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]