This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project. See the libstdc++
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Static data members in template declarations
- To: Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com>
- Subject: Re: Static data members in template declarations
- From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
- Date: 02 Nov 1998 05:51:37 -200
- Cc: mark@markmitchell.com, egcs@cygnus.com, stl@sgi.com, libstdc++-v3@cygnus.com
- In-Reply-To: Jason Merrill's message of "01 Nov 1998 23:15:20 -0800"
- References: <199811020050.QAA18401@smtp.earthlink.net> <or7lxe65xz.fsf@araguaia.dcc.unicamp.br> <u9emrmk1kn.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com>
- Sender: oliva@araguaia.dcc.unicamp.br
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.07004 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.40) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)
On Nov 2, 1998, Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br> writes:
>> Within the scope of S<T>, `a', `S::a' and `S<T>::a' are all the same
>> thing
> Nope. S::a and S<T>::a are the same, but they are dependent, and `a' is
> not. g++ doesn't currently implement that consistently.
The point I was trying to make is that they *should* be the same
thing.
--
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:oliva@gnu.org mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil