This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++-prs@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
libstdc++/9: libstdc++.2.9.0.6 does NOT build on Solaris2.6 with gcc2.95 or native CC
- To: libstdc++-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
- Subject: libstdc++/9: libstdc++.2.9.0.6 does NOT build on Solaris2.6 with gcc2.95 or native CC
- From: mjollnir@citysearch.com
- Date: 10 Sep 1999 04:02:05 -0000
- Reply-To: mjollnir@citysearch.com
- Resent-Cc: libstdc++-prs@sourceware.cygnus.com,
- Resent-Reply-To: gnats-admin@sourceware.cygnus.com, mjollnir@citysearch.com
- Resent-To: nobody@sourceware.cygnus.com
>Number: 9
>Category: libstdc++
>Synopsis: libstdc++.2.9.0.6 does NOT build on Solaris2.6 with gcc2.95 or native CC
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: high
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 09 21:07:00 PDT 1999
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: mjollnir@citysearch.com
>Release: libstdc++-2.9.0.6
>Organization:
>Environment:
Solaris-2.6
E-250
Compilers tried: gcc-2.8.1, gcc-2.95.1, SUNWspro/bin/cc
>Description:
bash-2.02# make
make all-recursive
Making all in math
Making all in string
Making all in libio
Making all in src
make: Fatal error in reader: Makefile, line 484: Extra `:', `::', or `:=' on dependency line
Current working directory /opt/libstdc++-2.90.6/src
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive'
Current working directory /opt/libstdc++-2.90.6
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive-am'
bash-2.02# cd src
bash-2.02# vi Makefile
line 484 is next one but last in this excerpt:
myinstallheaders: $(headers:%=$(myincludepfx)%)
@for i in $(std_headers); do \
echo "$(INSTALL_DATA) $(top_srcdir)/std/$$i $(myincludepfx)"; \
$(INSTALL_DATA) $(top_srcdir)/std/$$i $(myincludepfx); \
done
$(INSTALL_DATA) $(top_builddir)/bits/std_limits.h $(myincludepfx)/bits
$(INSTALL_DATA) $(top_builddir)/bits/c++config.h $(myincludepfx)/bits
>How-To-Repeat:
Run configure
Run make
>Fix:
?
Looks OK to my eyes
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: