This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:02:02 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
References: <mcrocaa18nt.fsf@google.com> <AANLkTikxZ+ZBo-AWL1M5dmdJWE4G=sVxUFpYGz0y7eqh@mail.gmail.com> <4CE4F09F.7010605@codesourcery.com> <4CE4F92C.4020905@redhat.com> <4CE5483B.3060606@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:37, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 2:00 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> I made it pretty clear that as long as the autotesters build java, and I
>> get emails when something breaks, and you have the obligation to fix
>> whatever broke, I have no objection.
>
> Great. ÂIn contrast to Ian's statement, then, I think we *do* have a
> consensus: remove Java from default languages, but do leave it in
> autotesters (with consequences as above).

I agree as well.


Diego.

References:
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]