Re: [patch] Fix oddity in personality routine

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Jack Howarth wrote:
>    I should also add that my results from testing the
> various i386 and x86_64 fink gcc44 and gcc45 packages
> under darwin9 and darwin10 are confusing. I find for
> gcj compiling java (but not class) files...
> 
>            i386-darwin9   x86_64-darwin9  i386-darwin10  x86_darwin10
> gcc 4.4.2    works           aborts         aborts          aborts
> gcc 4.5      aborts          aborts         aborts          aborts
> 
> I have a backport of the darwin10 patches from gcc 4.4
> that I can add to the current gcc 4.3 branch and try that
> but my gut instinct is that at best we will only find some
> revision where the latent problem is triggered but not
> indicating the exact origin of the problem.
>                Jack
> ps It might still be a good first step to make the Makefiles
> coherent (which they don't seem to be at the moment) with
> regard to the ecjx linkage flags.

The first step surely would be to have a look and see why ecj1 is
aborting.

Andrew.