This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I have a problem with jni code callbacks. I have attached some code that shows the problem. The result of this code is:
# results on fedora 11 # gcc/gcj 4.4.1 # kernel 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64 # openjdk fedora-29.b16.fc11-x86_64 # # open jdk gcj # no_jni 1.48 7.46 ( 5 times slower) # jni 66.70 17140.00 (257 times slower)
So when not using jni in this case gcj is 5 times slower. I suspect the jit compiler does a good for this small sample.
The code with jni calls is however 257 timer slower. I really did not expect that. I also tried other java vm and they all have much better performance. So I expect a problem in the gcj library.
When I use oprofile I see at lot of calls to execute_cfa_program and _Unwind_IteratePhdrCallback.
Attachment:
tst.tar
Description: Unix tar archive
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |