This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question of the status of GCJ

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Marco Trudel <marco at mtsystems dot ch>
Cc: Mike Purdy <purdymi at binghamtonschools dot org>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:36:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Question of the status of GCJ
References: <499A8751.1474.006D.0@binghamtonschools.org> <499AF7FC.6020109@redhat.com> <499AB740.1474.006D.0@binghamtonschools.org> <499B014E.5000802@redhat.com> <499B0E4E.9020503@mtsystems.ch>

Marco Trudel wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Mike Purdy wrote:
>>> Thank you Andrew. 
>>> This is interesting.  Does the OpenJDK allow native compilation?
>>
>> No.
> 
> But it would be possible with (relatively) less work.

Relative to writing the whole thing again, maybe, but still hard.

I'd love to find an excuse to do it.  gcj is still a very high-
performance implementation of the Java language.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Marco Trudel
- Re: Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Mike Purdy
- Re: Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Mike Purdy
- Re: Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Question of the status of GCJ
  - From: Marco Trudel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]