This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:58:43 -0300
- Subject: Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today
- References: <4889EB4C.7070200@google.com> <6dc9ffc80807250829u20672606n8e52a76ef90df49@mail.gmail.com> <4889F467.7010108@codesourcery.com>
On 7/25/08 12:42 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
Mainline is currently broken on a few platforms:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36907
I think we should fix it first before another big merge.
Diego, what do you think?
Well, what I understand is that the breakage is due to the
function-specific patches, and both branches are pretty orthogonal.
Merging tuples will neither help nor hinder fixing that problem, so in
principle I would vote to merge just the same.
In terms of regressions versus mainline, the only regressions introduced
by tuples wrt mainline are the matrix-reorg pass that still has not been
converted. It also fixes 4 libstdc++ testcases that are currently
broken in trunk:
Fixed regressions in
tuples/00testsuite.x86_64.legolas/20080725/libstdc++.sum.gz:
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc (test
for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/tree_data_map_rand.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/trie_data_map_rand.cc (test for
excess errors)
Diego.