This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:50:40 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > Carl Worth writes: > > Oh, but by the way, I couldn't get things to link when passing the > > -findirect-dispatch flag. I always got errors like: > > > > gcj -I `pkg-config --variable=CLASSPATH swt-gtk` > > -findirect-dispatch -fpic -fjni -c -o Snippet1.o Snippet1.java > > gcj -lswt --main=Snippet1 -o Snippet1 Snippet1.o > > /tmp/cceivJSw.o: In function `main': > > ccUlWBRV.i:(.text+0x2b): undefined reference to `Snippet1::class$' > > You seem to have forgotten about -findirect-dispatch -fpic ! OK. That's fairly embarrassing. I had really meant to stick to compile-and-link with one command to avoid issues like this. Anyway, it does work if I do it correctly. For example: gcj -I `pkg-config --variable=CLASSPATH swt-gtk` \ -findirect-dispatch -fpic -fjni \ -lswt --main=Snippet1 -o Snippet1 Snippet1.java And it also works without those flags: gcj -I `pkg-config --variable=CLASSPATH swt-gtk` -lswt \ --main=Snippet1 -o Snippet1 Snippet1.java I'm curious now if there's a significant difference one way or the other? Is something different happening or is the compiler figuring things out and acting the same in both cases? Thanks again for the help, -Carl
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |