This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
Cc: "David Daney" <ddaney at avtrex dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 09:43:57 -0700
Subject: Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
References: <998d0e4a0704070600v2d62f29eufefcfc4fb4efe3e4@mail.gmail.com> <4617B69E.8040506@avtrex.com> <998d0e4a0704070851o48329771p8adab0aed7eec11b@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/7/07, J.C. Pizarro <jcpiza@gmail.com> wrote:

Sure? Why GCJ depends on C++ of GCC?


Because part of the libgcj library is written in C++ :).  GCJ's
runtime library is written in Java, C, and C++ and C++ code can call
Java code via the CNI interface which was created even before JNI was
designed :).  GCJ does support JNI now too but GCJ was the first Java
implementation to support native libraries even before Sun did.

Someone needs to read code more.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: Andi Vajda

References:
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: J.C. Pizarro
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: David Daney
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: J.C. Pizarro

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]