This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
"Jim" == Jim Mayer <jim@pentastich.org> writes:
Jim> a few years ago people were complaining about the size of Jim> minimal gcj compiled applications that seem downright tiny now.
That's progress!
:)
By excluding, I mean this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2006-11/msg00096.html
Jim> Since there's so much stuff out there I'm hoping that someone will point Jim> me to some good information on the topic. I can see that a lot of Jim> internal compiler work has been going on (the new ABI stuff, major gcc Jim> changes, a new byte code compiler, etc.) and I'm having trouble figuring Jim> out how much of the stuff Google turns up is still relevant.
Off the top of my head:
* Many people doing static linking make a custom libcj, removing things they don't like.
* -freduced-reflection might help somewhat, but of course it affects what kinds of programs you can run. I'm not sure whether you can build all of libgcj this way or not; David Daney would know. Or perhaps Google.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |