Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine

[Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>]

Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2007-01-31, o godz12:50, przez Andrew Haley:

> Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> > I am somewhat concerned with the response of the java maintainers
> > (and others) that it's OK to require >512MB to bootstrap gcc with
> > java, or that make times "WORKSFORME."
>
> Well, I didn't say that, so I hope you aren't referring to me.  But
> before we do anything we need to know more about the machine on which
> it failed.
>
> Ultimately, it's a question of what we consider to be a reasonable
> machine on which to build libgcj.  I don't know the answer to that.

512MB is *certainly* resonable. It's the most common amount of  
shipping RAM
for in esp. notebooks and it's what usually get's allocated to  
virtualization
solutions.