This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ecj] gjar is installed, but we don't use it in the build

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:37:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [ecj] gjar is installed, but we don't use it in the build
References: <17791.57066.21115.493824@zebedee.pink> <m3irgf7lkd.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > Andrew> Weirdly, overriding JAR from the command line does not seem to work:
 > 
 > Try the appended.
 > 
 > Andrew> IMO this should be a merge blocker.
 > 
 > I suppose we could look for $(bindir)/gjar and use it if it exists.
 > This worries me a bit since I can't think of any other place in the
 > build system where we look at the new install tree for a tool.
 > 
 > Or are you asking for a simpler change, where configure uses 'gjar' if
 > it exists?  That would be completely unobjectionable to me.

Sounds good to me.  I'm jsut thinking ahead: we need to reduce the
pain of this merge as much as we can.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ecj] gjar is installed, but we don't use it in the build
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [ecj] gjar is installed, but we don't use it in the build
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [ecj] gjar is installed, but we don't use it in the build
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]