This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!


Tom Tromey wrote:
"Mohan" == Mohan Embar <gnustuff@thisiscool.com> writes:

I see.  And I guess there's no way to tell gij/libgcj (as opposed to
the actual compiler) to check getenv("CLASSPATH").  Bleh.

Mohan> There is a --classpath switch, but I'm not sure if you're allowed Mohan> to override the boot classpath this way. Or maybe using GCJ_PROPERTIES? Mohan> The Experts would know more about this....

Setting --classpath won't override the boot class path.
Also, if the boot class path is not set properly, and a class isn't compiled
in, having it on --classpath will cause it to be loaded by the wrong
class loader (system, not bootstrap), which may cause issues.

We do support overriding some built-in classes via endorsed dirs.

Some classes? Which? What's an "endorsed dir"? How to use that?
This would allow to play with the Sun AWT/Swing with GIJ. Would be interesting... When I'm already at it, I played already a little with that. Is it correct that GIJ has the class library compiled into its binary? No matter where I removed classes (libgcj.a or libgcj-4.2.0.jar), they where always still somewhere present...



But overall I think you're better off with the --whole-archive plan
for gij.

I didn't follow that thread too closely. You're talking about compiling GIJ, not about running a jar or a class with it, right?



Marco



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]