This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Doug Nicholson <doug at mathechyst dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 06 Dec 2006 16:51:10 -0700
Subject: Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
References: <457294AE.8050106@jr-pizarro.jazztel.es> <17778.50687.521541.984826@zebedee.pink> <m3odqiqkqn.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <1165410049.18216.21.camel@turing.mathechyst.com> <17782.54642.373025.626008@zebedee.pink>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

>> I started working down this path yesterday but I didn't get very far.  I
>> downloaded the 30 Nov source zip and compiled it according to the
>> instructions using the 1.5.0_10 JDK.  When I executed it some class
>> loader barfed with an unsupported class version error.

Andrew> Well, yeah.  That's because the class file version ID has been bumped.

Interesting.  Do we know what changes prompted this?

Doug, you may be able to use '-target 1.5' when invoking javac to work
around this.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
  - From: J.C.
- Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
  - From: Doug Nicholson
- Re: Can OpenJDK's compiler replace ECJ for GCJ?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]