Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Mohan" == Mohan Embar <gnustuff@thisiscool.com> writes:

Mohan> What's more, this (Makefile.am):
[...]
Mohan> ...leads me to wonder whether this could even work for
Mohan> static builds in the first place, given that even gij is
Mohan> broken on Win32 due to the fact that it really needs to be
Mohan> linked with the entirety of libgcj.a and not just whatever it
Mohan> happens to see at the moment it's being statically linked.

The Makefile as currently written assumes that either the interpreter
works, or you can use the system-wide .db to provide compiled objects
for ecj1.

I'm afraid I didn't consider Windows when writing this.  Sorry about
that.

I'm open to solutions.  What would work best?  We could compile the
ecj jar, though that is likely to be pretty unfriendly -- it is rather
big.

Tom