This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libjvm missing .so version number
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:39:23 +0000
- Subject: Re: libjvm missing .so version number
- References: <20061121161500.GA18313@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Jack Howarth writes:
> Shouldn't the shared libraries installed in lib/gcj-4.x.x have
> .so version numbers since they appear to be shared libraries and
> not modules ala python? Specifically on Darwin we see libjvm.dylib
> built without an associated .so version number.
Sounds like a Darwin bug. On GNU/Linux we have
lrwxrwxrwx 1 aph aph 15 Jul 28 17:08 /home/aph/install/lib64/libgcj.so -> libgcj.so.7.0.0*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 aph aph 15 Jul 28 17:08 /home/aph/install/lib64/libgcj.so.7 -> libgcj.so.7.0.0*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 aph aph 84086938 Jul 28 17:08 /home/aph/install/lib64/libgcj.so.7.0.0*
Andrew.