Re: Scanner Class

[Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org>]

On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:55 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Schuster <theBohemian@gmx.net> writes:
> 
> Robert> However it might be possible that someone has the start of an
> Robert> implementation lying around in her/his working copy? Anyone?
> 
> I have some code which I've never checked in.  It doesn't yet do
> enough to be useful.
> 
> At the moment I think it could only be developed on the Classpath
> generics branch.  It requires a regex fix which, as I recall, hasn't
> made it into libgcj yet.
> 
> Tom

Out of interest, why does it have to be developed on the generics branch
in particular?  I don't see anything that requires the 1.5 features from
glancing over the API, but I guess that doesn't mean that there isn't
something that comes up in the implementation.

Cheers,
-- 
Andrew :-)

Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part