This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Bug in JNI RegisterNatives?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Juerg Lehni <juerg at scratchdisk dot com>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Oct 2006 11:05:36 -0600
- Subject: Re: Bug in JNI RegisterNatives?
- References: <B3B02B14-9CE5-4CDF-B58E-2EDBC65586CB@scratchdisk.com> <m3slms355m.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <31CEC514-52BA-4958-84C0-7A8E91AFD9C6@scratchdisk.com> <447BA9E4.4050108@redhat.com> <29F77D12-B91D-4107-AEDB-9612AE7595E2@scratchdisk.com> <17533.35342.396152.717594@localhost.localdomain> <48BCE7D8-448B-4833-A5B0-02B1A20EDF69@scratchdisk.com> <m3r72acdny.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <3BB47CA3-604D-4B6A-981D-619908ECF37E@scratchdisk.com> <502662BF-FB14-476A-ACDC-F9F59805D6A1@scratchdisk.com> <4492D667.1050404@redhat.com> <5C909210-FB2C-4118-8B15-4599EE6E979E@scratchdisk.com> <15586E3D-C5A8-434B-A57A-1588108FC998@scratchdisk.com> <m3mz85rree.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
Tom> Basically I just added a new class name field to the entries in the
Tom> hash table. Could you try this patch with your test case and let me
Tom> know if it works? If it does I will check it in.
BTW -- I wrote a test case and verified that it failed before the
patch and worked after it. So I will probably just check this in.
Still, if you could try it, I would appreciate it.
Tom