This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcj-classpath-0_92-branch-point merge

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 23:37:56 +0200
Subject: Re: libgcj-classpath-0_92-branch-point merge
References: <1154267574.4853.15.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <1154292993.4853.36.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <44CDA53C.4050506@pop.agri.ch> <1154637243.21555.18.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org>

Hi Mark,

Mark Wielaard wrote:

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 08:37 +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Built on powerpc-darwin, sparc-solaris8 (32 and 64-bit), linux-ppc and hpux-pa. No problems so far.

I covered gtk, xlib and qt-peers. Not on every arch, but I built it on at least one of them.

Basic tests completed ok, hpux-pa outstanding, but I do not expect anything problematic.
Thanks for testing! Did you encounter anything problematic?
Which configure flags did you have to use?
I suspect we aren't handling things correctly on some systems if you
forget --disable-gconf-peer, and maybe plugin. Did you try without any
special configure flags? Does anything fail to compile in that case?

I'm sorry for private replying. Too many things are flying around....

Ok, the --disable-gconf-peer seems to be a _MUST_. On the --disable-plugin I'm not sure anymore. But to be on the safe side it would be better to disable.

Again, sorry.

Andreas

References:
- Re: libgcj-classpath-0_92-branch-point merge
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]