This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Symbol table resolution

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:38:16 +0100
Subject: Re: Symbol table resolution
References: <17543.3948.293570.795837@dell.pink> <448718EA.3010103@redhat.com> <17543.7271.988823.791090@dell.pink>

Andrew Haley writes:
 > Bryce McKinlay writes:
 >  > Andrew Haley wrote:
 >  > > Properly enforcing access rules in libgcj causes problems in that
 >  > > compiler-generated code sometimes wants to access private methods.
 >  > >   
 >  > Presumably, this is only because GCJ doesn't generate accessor methods 
 >  > correctly? [*]
 > 
 > No, it's nothing to do with accessor methods.

Having said that, I should test this patch with 19870 to make sure
code still works.  Thanks for the heads-up!

Andrew.

References:
- Symbol table resolution
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Symbol table resolution
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Symbol table resolution
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]