This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: pierre-olivier dot gaillard at fr dot thalesgroup dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:18:57 -0700
Subject: Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
References: <44859BB9.8000608@fr.thalesgroup.com> <m3odx6grji.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Tom Tromey wrote:

">" == P O Gaillard <pierre-olivier.gaillard@fr.thalesgroup.com> writes:
I am using the gcj 4.1 that came with Fedora Core 5 and the NIO
buffers are quite slow. From what I see with Oprofile, I would say
that this is because the code is not inlined.
Which specific methods should be inlined but aren't?

All methods could be. The compiler could treat all Buffers as if they were fancy arrays.

David Daney.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: P.O. Gaillard
- Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]