This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Up-to-date News on GCJ
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:34:41 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Up-to-date News on GCJ
- References: <e415m2$lpg$1@sea.gmane.org> <m3wtcpuamo.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <4466F79E.1030204@gmail.com> <m3y7x3mgio.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <446ACCF9.6060305@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0606010137200.19804@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <447E994B.4030207@redhat.com>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> I quite like the new www.gnu.org design. Its much more modern looking
> than the gcc/gcj pages now. I certainly wouldn't object to using
> www.gnu.org as a model for a redesign of the gcc/gcj pages.
Consider it done. :-) Just give me another hour or so.
> IMO we do have - somewhat - different PR needs. For one thing, our
> audience is different - we're reaching out to Java developers who may
> not necessarily have any interest in C/C++ or the rest of the compiler
> suite. Also, GCJ can be seen as a collection of technologies of which
> the compiler is just one part. That isn't to say the pages should be
> separate, but it would be confusing if (for example) too much non-Java
> information were to be seen on the GCJ pages.
I'd definitely like to see more Java information on the non-Java-specific
pages (especially our main news section), though. ;-)
Gerald