This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: serial comm. with rxtx, GPSExplorer, and GCJ -- runtime exception


Michael Mohr wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:26:05 -0700
David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> wrote:


Michael Mohr wrote:

Hello,

I'm currently attempting to use GCC 4.1's gcj to compile a medium-sized (6000-line) java application. Unfortunately, it requires raw access to serial ports, as implemented by RXTX. It appears that RXTX has already been modified to compile using CNI; however, the port appears to be in early alpha stage.

I am able to compile RXTX (mostly) without complaint. I am also able to compile my application -- GPSExplorer -- with no warnings or errors using GCC 4.1. However, it exits when run with the following exception:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
  at gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GdkGraphicsEnvironment.getAllFonts (lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.so)
  at GPSExplorer.<init> (GPSExplorer)
  at GPSExplorer.main (GPSExplorer)


Looks like GraphicsEnvironment.getAllFonts() is not supported by your libgcj.


Okay. Is there a person who I could contact that is working on related classes? I'd be happy to lend a hand, at least in regards to implementing functions missing from my own application.


The classpath project is the source of the culpable code. See http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/



The program makes use of the AWT and Swing classes. It runs perfectly under any JVM after 1.2 (and probably before, but I haven't tested that far back). I compile and link GPSExplorer as follows:

rm -f *.o *.s GPSExplorer

for x in *.java
do
 gcj -classpath .:$PWD/RXTX/RXTX.jar -c $x
done

gcj *.o -L$PWD/RXTX -lrxtx -o GPSExplorer --main=GPSExplorer

As I see it, there are 3 possibilities:
 o Something is wrong with the app in question, GPSExplorer

Perhaps.



o Something went wrong with the CNI RXTX port

Again, perhaps, but that is not the problem you are seeing.



o Something isn't right with GCJ


Yeah. The AWT support is not complete yet.


I figured that, but I didn't want to seem pretentious by stating that there was a problem with GCJ. There may still be problems with GPSExplorer under GCJ, but as of yet this is the most visible issue. Incidentally, why was I able to compile and link GPSExplorer if a used function was not available?

Many methods are stubbed out so that you don't get compile time errors. That this is a good thing is up for debate.





The text of the error leads me to Door #3, but I could be very wrong. This is my first attempt to compile a large Java application using GCJ.

Here's the output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0-r1/work/gcc-4.1.0/configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.1.0 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0 --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/man --infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/include/g++-v4 --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-checking --disable-werror --disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-multilib --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-languages=c,c++,java,fortran --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 (Gentoo 4.1.0-r1)

When I enable -Wall, I get hundreds of warnings, all of which are either:
o warning: Discouraged redundant use of 'public' modifier in declaration of abstract method o warning: An empty declaration is a deprecated feature that should not be used.


Other than those two errors, nothing is reported. This is the contents of GPSExplorermain.i after the final link with -save-temps:


Then don't enable -Wall.


I'm perfectly aware that I can choose not to enable -Wall. I was following precisely the directions given for filing a bug report, which state at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html :

"Before reporting that GCC compiles your code incorrectly, please compile it with gcc -Wall and see whether this shows anything wrong with your code that could be the cause instead of a bug in GCC."

I wanted it to be clear that I had read the directions and was following procedure.


Right, good point.


David Daney


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]