This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: The cost of stack traces

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:27:17 -0700
Subject: Re: The cost of stack traces
References: <17506.13640.193169.555346@dell.pink> <1147283970.2910.363.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17506.25275.749393.862331@dell.pink>

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 18:01 -0400, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Yes.  All we have to do is keep a table that maps IP address -> filename.

I think I'm thinking of something even simpler, where we map whole
chunks of stack to partial traces, then we wouldn't even have to walk
the entire stack.

AG

References:
- The cost of stack traces
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: The cost of stack traces
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: The cost of stack traces
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]