This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj problem with -static option

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: FERANDELLE Pascal <pascal dot ferandelle at fr dot thalesgroup dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:35:16 +0000
Subject: Re: gcj problem with -static option
References: <44193173.9E6E912A@fr.thalesgroup.com> <17433.17570.765227.73659@zapata.pink> <44199FED.3F6C31C0@fr.thalesgroup.com> <4419A159.6050008@redhat.com>

Diego Novillo writes:
 > On 03/16/06 12:27, FERANDELLE Pascal wrote:
 > 
 > > I rebuild everything with GCC 4.1.0 version on PC running RedHat EL 3.0.
 > > My simple HelloWorld program is still "segfaulting" when compiled with the -static option.
 > > But the trace under gdb has changed; I have now :
 > > 
 > This may or may not be related but we had similar looking problems with
 >  OpenMP programs.  They were segfaulting on startup when linked statically.
 > 
 > It apparently is a problem with weak symbols in the threading library
 > not being pulled in with -static.
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00248.html

Ooh, nasty.  Thanks for that.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcj problem with -static option
  - From: David Daney

References:
- gcj problem with -static option
  - From: FERANDELLE Pascal
- Re: gcj problem with -static option
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: gcj problem with -static option
  - From: FERANDELLE Pascal
- Re: gcj problem with -static option
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]