Re: jc1 and different vm langauges

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Jakob Praher writes:
 > Andrew Haley schrieb:
 > > Jakob Praher writes:
 > 
 > > Java classes are declared in Java, not in C++.  
 > Thanks. Yes I am aware of that fact. It is just a matter of
 > understanding the implications of having a different name mangling for
 > C++ and Java. This also means that another c++ compiler won't be able to
 >  use a gcjh generated header to link against a Java so.

Yes.

 > Is there a plan to add return types to the C++ name mangling in general?
 > (anybody aware of such a change for C++0x?)

Not that I'm aware of.

Andrew.