This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [Ping] gcc+gcj build-times? QUESTION.3
- From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
- To: Norman Hendrich <hendrich at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:36:08 -0500
- Subject: Re: [Ping] gcc+gcj build-times? QUESTION.3
- References: <20060226103508.2482962@rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Norman Hendrich wrote:
Note that the speed of the matrix calculations seems pretty competitive,
but the animation runs _slower_ under gcj than jamvm+classpath. Also
note that the animation just calls Graphics.fillRect().
The difference between libgcj and JamVM here is quite likely due to
painting improvements that have been made upstream in Classpath HEAD
that are not yet in libgcj. We'll do a fresh Classpath import soon -
probably once Classpath 0.21 is released.
Bryce