This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [Fwd: Success with Nutch & GCJ]
I presume you found GC_set_warn_proc()? It's possible to do all of
this outside the collector.
I'm not completely sure what's best here. This might be a useful option for
the collector in general. But it's ability to generate stack traces is
probably considerably more limited than gcj's.
Is the Google code limited to X86? I probably wouldn't want the collector
itself to depend on it anyway, though it does sound very useful.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 13:24 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > >>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Hans> You might be able to determine who is doing the allocation by setting a
> > Hans> break point in GC_default_warn_proc, and looking at the call
> > Hans> stack.
> > Maybe we could have that (optionally) print a stack trace for us.
> I get this message from azureus as well and was planning on having it
> dump core instead: http://goog-coredumper.sourceforge.net/
> I've tried the google coredumper, and it really works.