This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thomas at tada dot se>, Rui Wang <Rui dot Wang at newcastle dot ac dot uk>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 15 Feb 2006 10:55:36 -0700
Subject: Re: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
References: <9366880017F98D4EA02E4412380B82024E8FCA@moonraker.campus.ncl.ac.uk> <17394.3415.506542.476157@zapata.pink> <9366880017F98D4EA02E4412380B8202177677@moonraker.campus.ncl.ac.uk> <1139996497.4579.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17395.7944.278097.402086@zapata.pink> <43F352F5.40308@tada.se> <17395.21982.185637.732151@zapata.pink>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> For what it's worth, I was quite suprised that gcj didn't spot the
Andrew> same opportunity.  Maybe this is part of the value range propagation
Andrew> optimizations that aren't yet in core gcc.

Yeah, I'm surprised too.
Maybe file it in bugzilla for later testing?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Rui Wang
- Re: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Andrew Haley
- RE: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Rui Wang
- RE: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- RE: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Speed Impact experiment on GCJ
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]