This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reconsidering gcjx

From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, tromey at redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:57:39 -0800
Subject: Re: Reconsidering gcjx
References: <m3d5iewn0r.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <200601271425.k0REPLNl013872@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <1138399752.20435.1465.camel@pc.site> <200601280013.k0S0D0Ec018678@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <87bqxxp5ar.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu> <43DABDBA.9020205@bothner.com>

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 16:41 -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
> I.e. I'm hoping one can *statically* link ecj without any
> dependencies on (say) the SWT toolkit, or the debugger?

Yes, you can.  And when references have crept in by mistake, the Eclipse
guys were pretty quick about removing them.

BTW, the compiler can be checked out and built from this module...

cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@dev.eclipse.org:/home/eclipse co org.eclipse.jdt.core

(For the record, I think if people ask the Eclipse compiler people about
"ecj" they'll have no idea what you're talking about!  It was just
invented when we first started building it as a stand-alone batch
compiler in order to build Eclipse via RPM.  It was a convenient name to
use since upstream didn't provide one.)

AG

References:
- Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]