This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: PR middle-end/25121: [4.1/4.2 Regression] libgcj misscompilation? [Was Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P]
Richard Henderson writes:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:40:20AM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > + /* Don't replace sequences with FRAME_RELATED_P insns. */
> > + if (try != NULL && match_len < frame_related_distance)
>
> I think I'd rather that you manipulate peep2_current_count
> than adding a new counter.
Oh, joy. Now I have to figure out what peep2_current_count is doing...
Later,
Andrew.