This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Are non-SJLJ exceptions busted on linux/x86?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Scott Gilbertson" <scottg at mantatest dot com>
- Cc: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, "Mohan Embar" <gnustuff at thisiscool dot com>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:51:04 -0700
- Subject: Re: Are non-SJLJ exceptions busted on linux/x86?
- References: <200511172029.jAHKTRUC019524@earth.phy.uc.edu> <49eb01c5ebbd$c903e870$3c16a8c0@mantatest.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Gilbertson <scottg@mantatest.com> writes:
Scott> B) Because that's what you usually want if you're building
Scott> embedded systems (as I am)
Yeah, I agree. We don't want to break static builds.
I do worry that changing the locale resources to be property files
will break this... something to investigate before making this change.
Scott> F) Because someday gcj might work for no-filesystem
Scott> environments, but only if it can make a static binary
I thought this worked already? It did in the distant past, maybe it
just rotted from disuse. Or maybe it "worked" because this was an
attribute of newlib and not libgcj. Anyway writing support for this
should not be too hard.
Tom