Re: Are non-SJLJ exceptions busted on linux/x86?

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

Scott Gilbertson wrote:
> > Scott Gilbertson wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Is something busted in the non-SJLJ unwind mechanism with recent builds
>
> for
>
> > > linux/x86?  If so, perhaps --enable-sjlj-exceptions should be the default
>
> on
>
> > > that platform.  If not, is there some dependency I need to make it work?
> > >
> > > With recent trunk, my dynamic executables work but static and interpreted
> > > both fail, as I mentioned in earilier posts referenced below.
> >
> > FYI I cannot reproduce the interpreter failure, either on 32 or 64 bit
> > x86. What glibc and binutils version are you using?
> >
> > $ rpm -q binutils glibc
> > binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2-2
> > glibc-2.3.90-12
>
>
> I'm using:
> binutils-2.15.90.0.3-1mdk
> glibc-2.3.3-21mdk
>
> Scott

I was not able to figure out if you are using a shared glibc.

Are you?

If so, and the dwarf exception unwinder is aborting, then there is 
clearly a bug somewhere.

If not, I have no opinion.

David Daney.