This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Socket's close() doesn't close connection (old bug?)


* Tom Tromey:

> Martin> So I guess it's only a matter of interrupting any blocking thread when
> Martin> close() is invoked - then everything will be good?!
>
> I've always thought this bug to be rather strange, as I would have
> expected the kernel to notify all read()ers on an fd that was closed
> out from under them.  Most likely this just points out some flaw in my
> understanding though.

This has been discussed on linux-kernel, see
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=99183809500003>.

> I wonder whether using select before the read would help.

There would still be a race between the select and read.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]