This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Running the testsuite
- From: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
- To: tj at laurenzo dot org
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:15:50 +0530
- Subject: Re: Running the testsuite
- Openpgp: url=http://ranjitmathew.hostingzero.com/aa_6C114B8F.txt
- References: <5652dcd5050921212250f3a8d4@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
TJ Laurenzo wrote:
> I am trying to validate my patch to fix PR 9861 before submitting, but
> this is my first experience running the testsuite and interpreting
> results. I am running "make check" on a native build of gcc for
> i686-pc-linux-gnu. Since this is a pre-release version, I expect
> there to be some failing tests. Is there some reference that I can
> use to figure out what should and shouldn't be working at this stage?
Many people regularly post their testresults to the
"gcc-testresults" mailing list. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/current/
and look at a couple of "4.1.0" testresults for "i686-pc-linux-gnu".
> - (libjava.sum) A lot of failures in compile.exp. They are all
> when compiling a test case from byte code. When I manually ran a
> couple of the checks, there seemed to be verification problems.
> - (libjava.sum) FAIL: PR16923.c compilation (this is a JNI test
> and might be related to some tweaking I did to the build)
BTW, be sure to also test your patch with Jacks included. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html#TOC2
I regularly run the "libjava" testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
and there should be no FAILs in the current mainline, including
Jacks.
Ranjit.
- --
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://ranjitmathew.hostingzero.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDMmEuYb1hx2wRS48RAnueAJ9qtftzpIXB30toqdq2M7mM6OEpdACeNPBS
ivlYCfIS+adIg6yM6n+13T4=
=esy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----