This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Linker name conflicts due to optimization in gjavah
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: tj at laurenzo dot org
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Aug 2005 17:43:53 -0600
- Subject: Re: Linker name conflicts due to optimization in gjavah
- References: <5652dcd5050817115015ad67bd@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Terry" == Terry Laurenzo <tlaurenzo@gmail.com> writes:
Terry> At the risk of offending the person who wrote the optimization code, I
Terry> suggest that it be taken out. I found this in CVS head and the
Terry> 5/15/2005 snapshort. Any objections? Should a bug be opened?
I agree that we should take this out. This code seems to violate the
one definition rule, at least in spirit. It isn't surprising that
some change somewhere broke it.
If we think this kind of thing is still worthwhile, we could just as
easily achieve it by emitting CNI headers without access protection
and just directly mucking about with fields.
Tom