This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
>>>>> "Rutger" == Rutger Ovidius <r_ovidius@eml.cc> writes:
RH> But still largely useless. Who in their right mind is going to
RH> use an 83MB static library when a shared library is available.
Rutger> Everyone on win32 builds libgcj static, and probably wants to keep it
Rutger> that way if they plan to distribute their apps.
I thought the reason everybody on win32 built static was that there
was no choice. Is it really preferable?
I'm sympathetic to folks who want static builds for various reasons.
I wouldn't mind an option to allow libgcj to be built in some reduced
form, either; though it would be up to the folks using this mode to
maintain it.
Tom