This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Proposal: don't install CNI headers by default

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:53:29 -0800
Subject: Re: Proposal: don't install CNI headers by default
References: <1110558986.26331.12.camel@tortoise.toronto.redhat.com> <16945.51821.23468.564066@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley wrote:

Thomas Fitzsimmons writes: > Hi, > > A large part of the time taken by "make install" is spent installing CNI > headers. I propose that we don't install them by default, and create an > "install-cni-headers" target instead.

use make install-exec.

Since it appears that there is a way for gcj developers to save time by using install-exec, I am against removing the header install.

We use CNI extensively and having an extra step that is subject to bit-rot seems like it has the potential to break things.

Just my $0.02

David Daney.

References:
- Proposal: don't install CNI headers by default
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
- Re: Proposal: don't install CNI headers by default
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]