This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
bug 18212 closed too early (by me) ?
- From: Bojan Antonovic <bojan at antonovic dot com>
- To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:06:48 +0100
- Subject: bug 18212 closed too early (by me) ?
Some months ago I reported bug 18212. In the recent days I discovered
(after MANY hours of code stripping and testing) that it can be splitted
to bugs 20351 and 20362. Because I thought that in the case when it
produced the ICE that the reason is exactly like in 20362 (missing
files), I marked it as a duplicate of 20362.
Now the problem: Bug 18212 was correctly reported. There's no simple
trick to avoid the ICE. It could be that bug 20362 is completly
independet of bug 18212 even if produces the same output! Or fixing bug
20362 would fix bug 18212. Or many ways lead to ICE in GCJ ... (hoping
for not!)
The question: Should I reopen bug 18212, or wait until bug 20362 (and
bug 20351) are fixed to retest it and to reopen if necessary? Or both
(reopen and retest later) ?
Bojan