This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: multiple definition of __mingwthr_key_dtor
- From: Fabio Roger <fabioroger at gmail dot com>
- To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Danny Smith <dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net>, gcj <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:00:47 +0800
- Subject: Re: multiple definition of __mingwthr_key_dtor
- References: <000701c51565$615e5720$164861cb@DANNY> <4219825C.6090304@gmail.com>
hmm.. no I havent.. but there is still room for a bug report, right? coz
other drawback is the linking with "-lgcj -lstd++".. which, as long as I
know, is undocumented
(btw it worked just fine, thanks Danny!).
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 12:10 +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> Danny Smith wrote:
> > This is not the best solution, but to get rid of the multiple definition
> > errors when linking in C++ objects, link with -lgcj -lstdc++ (in that
> > order). This will bring in the libgcj:win32.cc definitions of the
> > symbols. The problem with this workaround is that it means your C++
> > module(s) will leak memory if they create threads, since they will be
> > using libgcj's bogus definition of __mingwthr_key_dtor.
> >
> > Really this should be reported as a bug if one for this problem doesn't
> > already exist.
>
> I hope you have seen:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-03/msg00082.html
>
> and related messages.
>
> Ranjit.
>