This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Modules names and other details for new classpath bug product
- From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- Cc: classpath at gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:03:38 -0800
- Subject: Re: Modules names and other details for new classpath bug product
- References: <1108400078.1701.42.camel@localhost> <4210EDF8.8080705@avtrex.com>
David Daney wrote:
How would a bug be marked that is fixed in libgcj and not fixed in
classpath?
It sounds a bit questionable to merge the bug tracking system before we
have a single merged code base.
Maybe we shuld treat libgcj and classpath as branches of a common
"virtual repository". This does not necessaily mean using the same
cvs (or snv) repository, though that is an option. It does mean
marking bugs in bugzilla in as *if* they were branches. It would
require thinking about naming convention for "target milestones" etc.
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/