Re: Modules names and other details for new classpath bug product

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> Assuming we don't get huge objections to the proposal to move all GNU
> Classpath bugs to a new gcc bugzilla product we should already start
> thinking about some details of the new setup. Here is my proposal.
.
.
.
> Comments? Other suggestions?

My understanding is that you want to integrate the libgcj and classpath 
bug databases with but still maintain the current situation with the 
actual code where there are separate code bases.

How would a bug be marked that is fixed in libgcj and not fixed in 
classpath?

It sounds a bit questionable to merge the bug tracking system before we 
have a single merged code base.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are recommending.

David Daney