This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:48:26 +0000
Subject: Re: RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier
References: <cru1u6$p0n$1@sea.gmane.org><16866.36270.748853.49185@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><39399b9d0501100631282a15f0@mail.gmail.com><16866.38029.439146.554950@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><cru7t8$d1j$1@sea.gmane.org>

Ranjit Mathew writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > 
 > > It's far better simply to revert the old verifier to pre-merge.
 > 
 > I bootstrapped by reverting verify.c to revision 1.66
 > (pre-BC-ABI-merge) on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
 > 
 > The good news is that it was successful and didn't produce
 > any new failures. It also converted the current ICE in PR5537
 > to the old verification error.
 > 
 > The bad news is that the following XPASSes disappeared:
 > 
 >   XPASS: pr13107_3 compilation from bytecode
 >   XPASS: pr13107_3 -O3 compilation from bytecode
 > 
 > Shall I still go ahead?

I think so.  Thos tests only passed because the warning was suppressed.

Andrew.

References:
- RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: RFC: BC-ABI and Old Verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]