This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Andi Vajda <andi at osafoundation dot org>
Cc: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:07:14 +0000
Subject: Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
References: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0412142254170.6313@zoe.ovaltofu.org><200412152009.14246.konqueror@gmx.de><Pine.OSX.4.61.0412151113180.6738@zoe.ovaltofu.org><200412152024.19665.konqueror@gmx.de><Pine.OSX.4.61.0412151200210.6746@zoe.ovaltofu.org><16832.39238.856139.952169@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><Pine.OSX.4.61.0412151347580.7032@zoe.ovaltofu.org>

Andi Vajda writes:
 > 
 > > > warning: Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function.
 > > > GDB will be unable to debug shared library initializers
 > > > and track explicitly loaded dynamic code.
 > >
 > > That's a clue.  :-)
 > 
 > Yes, I noticed that too. Is there a way to help gdb with that ?

It might be because something has its debug info stripped.  Maybe
Python?

Andrew.

References:
- linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Andi Vajda
- Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Andi Vajda
- Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Andi Vajda
- Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: linking a .so with libgcj.a ?
  - From: Andi Vajda

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]