This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fnew-verifier

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
Cc: GCJ Hackers <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 29 Nov 2004 17:23:27 -0700
Subject: Re: -fnew-verifier
References: <m3653oqm32.fsf@localhost.localdomain><41ABB0DB.5010603@redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

Bryce> Agreed. Also, if we arn't going to make --indirect-dispatch the
Bryce> default for 4.0, then we should at least make it the default on the
Bryce> HEAD as soon as 4.0 branches.

Bryce> Are there any strong against making it the default, anyway?
Bryce> Performance? Bugs?

AFAIK right now -findirect-dispatch only works when compiling from
.class.  There's also the CNI problem.

It would be less risky to do another release as is and make it the
default when it is more complete and has had more testing in the
field.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fnew-verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- -fnew-verifier
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: -fnew-verifier
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]